Method of and apparatus for image denoising

ABSTRACT

An image denoising system and method of implementing the image denoising system is described herein. Noise is decomposed within each channel into frequency bands, and sub-band noise is propagated. Denoising is then able to occur at any node in a camera pipeline after accurately predicting noise that is signal level-dependent, frequency dependent and has inter-channel correlation. A methodology is included for estimating image noise in each color channel at a sensor output based on average image level and camera noise parameters. A scheme is implemented for detecting a peak-white image level for each color channel and predicting image level values for representative colors. Based on a noise model and camera parameters, noise levels are predicted for each color channel for each color patch and these noise levels are propagated to the denoising node. A three dimentional LUT correlates signal level to noise level. Then, a denoising threshold is adaptively controlled.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of signal processing. Morespecifically, the present invention relates to image denoising.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Most image denoising algorithms use a basic concept that attempts toperform two opposite goals at the same time: (i) preserve image edges(the spatially correlated high frequency component of the signal) and(ii) smooth out noise (the spatially uncorrelated high frequencycomponent of the signal). A processing step called thresholding orcoring is often used to achieve these goals. The operation smooths outthe signal variability whose amplitude is smaller than a certainthreshold which is considered as a border line to discriminate signaland noise. In other denoising algorithms, such as bilateral filtering,the noise-signal border is defined in a softer way using a Gaussianfunction to evaluate the variability of a signal within a neighborhoodof a pixel. In such algorithms, an appropriate value has to be specifiedto determine the width of the Gaussian function, and such parametersetting is as important as in the other threshold-based denoisingalgorithms. If the threshold (or equivalent) in a denoising system isimproperly set, the denoising effect may not be satisfactory, or may endup with too much blurred image with over-attenuated edges.

Therefore, appropriate threshold (or equivalent) setting is essential tohave satisfactory image quality. It is also important to precisely knowthe noise amount at the node of signal path where denoising isperformed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An image denoising system and method of implementing the image denoisingsystem is described herein. The image denoising system and methodutilizes a fast accurate multi-channel frequency dependent scheme foranalyzing noise. Noise is decomposed within each channel into frequencybands, and sub-band noise is propagated. Denoising is then able to occurat any node in a camera pipeline after accurately predicting noise thatis signal level-dependent, frequency dependent and has inter-channelcorrelation. A methodology is included for estimating image noise ineach color channel at a sensor output based on average image level andcamera noise parameters. A scheme is implemented for detecting apeak-white image level for each color channel and predicting image levelvalues for a set of representative colors. Based on a noise model andcamera parameters, noise levels are predicted for each color channel foreach color patch and these noise levels are propagated to the denoisingnode. A three dimentional LUT correlates signal level to noise level.Then a denoising threshold is adaptively controlled.

In one aspect, a method of denoising an image comprises acquiring animage wherein the image contains noise, splitting the noise into aplurality of sub-bands of noise, determining a threshold for eachsub-band of noise and filtering out the noise below the threshold foreach sub-band of noise. The method further comprises acquiring one ormore camera parameters. The method further comprises computing inputnoise matrices by incorporating the one or more camera parameters. Themethod further comprises propagating band-wise noise from the noisematrices. The method further comprises generating a signal-to-noise lookup table to correlate signal values and noise values. The method furthercomprises predicting a pixel-by-pixel noise amount using thesignal-to-noise look up table. The threshold is a pixel-by-pixelthreshold. The noise is filtered out by the pixel-by-pixel threshold.The one or more camera parameters include at least one of amplifiergain, auto-white balancing gains, edge enhancement gain and colorcorrection matrices parameters. The one or more parameters are availableat a processor when implemented on a camera. The one or more parametersare available via header information in an image when implemented withimage rendering software on a computing device. Propagating band-wisenoise further includes band-splitting the input noise matrices into Nsub-bands each. The steps of acquiring an image, splitting the noise anddetermining a threshold occur in real-time. Predicting thepixel-by-pixel noise amount further includes inputting a pixel valueinto the look up table, converting the input pixel value to a predictednoise amount, mapping signal value on an input signal to band-wise noisematrices using the look up table and interpolating and extrapolatingband-wise noise matrices according to the signal value. The methodfurther comprises updating the look up table when a shooting conditionchanges.

In another aspect, a method of denoising an image comprises acquiringone or more camera parameters, computing input noise matrices byincorporating the one or more camera parameters, propagating band-wisenoise from the input noise matrices, generating a signal-to-noise lookup table to correlate signal values and noise values, predicting apixel-by-pixel noise amount using the signal-to-noise look up table,controlling a pixel-by-pixel threshold and filtering out noise in theimage using the pixel-by-pixel threshold. The one or more cameraparameters include at least one of amplifier gain, auto-white balancinggains, edge enhancement gain and color correction matrices parameters.The one or more parameters are available at a processor when implementedon a camera. The one or more parameters are available via headerinformation in an image when implemented with image rendering softwareon a computing device. Propagating band-wise noise further includesband-splitting an input noise matrix into N sub-bands. The steps ofacquiring one or more camera parameters, computing input noise matrices,propagating band-wise noise and generating a signal-to-noise look uptable occur in real-time. Predicting the pixel-by-pixel noise amountfurther includes inputting a pixel value into the look up table,converting the input pixel value to a predicted noise amount, mappingsignal value on an input signal to band-wise noise matrices using thelook up table and interpolating and extrapolating band-wise noisematrices according to the signal value. The method further comprisesupdating the look up table when a shooting condition changes.

In yet another aspect, a system for denoising an image comprises animage processing pipeline and a noise reduction control unit coupled tothe image processing pipeline, wherein the noise reduction control unitdetermines threshold values to reduce noise. The image processingpipeline further comprises an imager for acquiring the image, a set ofimaging components coupled to the imager for processing the image, anoise reduction block coupled to the set of imaging components forreducing the noise in the image and a set of post-processing componentscoupled to the noise reduction block for processing the image afternoise reduction. The noise reduction block splits the noise intosub-bands and utilizes thresholds received from the noise reductioncontrol unit to filter the noise. The noise reduction control unitgenerates thresholds based on the sub-bands. The noise reduction controlunit is implemented on a processor. The noise reduction control unitimplements an imager noise model, noise propagation and predictedband-wise noise matrices to determine the threshold values.

In another aspect, a system for denoising an image comprises an imageprocessing pipeline, wherein the image processing pipeline furthercomprises an imager for acquiring the image, a set of imaging componentscoupled to the imager for processing the image, a noise reduction blockcoupled to the set of imaging components for reducing the noise in theimage and a set of post-processing components coupled to the noisereduction block for processing the image after noise reduction and aprocessor implementing a noise reduction control unit function coupledto the image processing pipeline, wherein the processor determinesthreshold values to reduce noise. The noise reduction block splits thenoise into sub-bands and utilizes thresholds received from the noisereduction control unit to filter the noise. The processor generatesthresholds based on the sub-bands. The processor implements an imagernoise model, noise propagation and predicted band-wise noise matrices todetermine the threshold values.

In another aspect, a method of denoising an image comprises detecting anaverage image level at a sensor for each color channel in a set of colorchannels, estimating an average noise level for each color channel inthe set of color channels, predicting noise at a node where denoising isperformed and controlling a threshold for denoising.

In another aspect, a method of denoising an image comprises detecting apeak-white image level at an image sensor for each color channel in aset of color channels, predicting image levels for a set ofrepresentative colors, computing a noise level of each color patch andeach color channel, predicting noise at a node where denoising isperformed, generating a three dimensional look up table to correlatesignal level to noise level and adaptively controlling a thresholdsetting for denoising.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a camera pipeline.

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of an image denoising system.

FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart of the procedure for denoising using theimage denoising system.

FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart of the procedure for denoising using theimage denoising system including additional steps.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

In most practical denoising system implementations and designs,parameter tuning has heavily relied on a trial-and-error approach, beingbased on subjective evaluation by a designer which is time-consuming anddepends on personal preference of the designer.

Generally image noise at a sensor output is able to be assumed as white,Gaussian and spatially uncorrelated, where the standard deviation isdefined as:σ_(pixel)=√{square root over (ax ² +bx+c)}  (1)where x is pixel intensity and a, b and c are constants specific toimage sensor, analog preprocessing and analog-to-digital convertercircuits. Constant a corresponds to pixel-to-pixel aperture variation,constant b to optical-shot noise and constant c to floor noise includesthermal noise, dark shot noise and pixel-to-pixel dark currentvariation. Constants a, b and c can be determined either by measurementor by theoretical derivation. As shown, it is relatively simple topredict a noise amount in an image at the image sensor output. However,the more the image is processed toward final output, the morecomplicated the noise characteristics become (FIG. 1).

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a camera pipeline 100. An image sensor102 sends a Gaussian, white and uncorrelated noise but has signal leveldependence. The noise also has missing pixels (mosaiced). A gaincomponent 104 produces high gain at low-light and low gain athigh-light. Signal-noise behavior changes accordingly. A white balancecomponent 106 changes gains for R, G and B depending on illumination.Furthermore, channel dependence exists after the white balance component106. After using a demosaicing component 108 to demosaic complete RGBplanes, there is frequency dependent inter-channel correlation.Specifically, G-channel high frequency noise is copied to the B and Rchannels, maintaining higher inter-channel correlation than at lowfrequency. After a matrix component 110 the inter-channel correlation ismore complicated. After a gamma component 112, strong level dependenceis added, and the noise is not Gaussian anymore. An RGB to YCbCr matrix114 adds additional inter-channel dependence. A sharpening/filteringcomponent 116 boosts Y signal high frequency and bandlimits the Csignal, causing additional frequency dependence. Final camera outputusually has channel wise (YCbCr), signal-level-wise and band-wise noise.

It is not a simple task to predict noise amount in, for instance, Cbchannel in YCbCr color space, which is widely used for camera outputimage format. Usually, Cb is approximately equal to 0 at either black,white or gray patches, while noise amount differs in each patch becausenoise amount generally decreases as image intensity increases due totone curve applied to image signal at gamma correction. This means thatsimply measuring the Cb value will not lead to precisely predicting thenoise amount in a Cb signal. In addition, signal and noise in the Cbchannel is usually band-limited. In order to relate the original sensornoise to Cb noise, the calculation method has to consider spatial filteroperations inserted between the image sensor and YCbCr output.

To address the above-mentioned problem, measurement-based noise amountidentification has been proposed and used. However, in this case, theimage pipeline has to have extra circuitry to measure the noise amountwithin a certain size of image window, which could be a cost and sizeimpact for the system. Furthermore, since larger window size translatesto more precise noise prediction, there is a tradeoff between hardwaresize and precision. Also, the measurement-based noise amountidentification is not always perfect because it is hard to discriminatenoise from scene texture.

Some Noise Reduction (NR) theories (such as wavelet NR), providestatistical/mathematical derivation of the optimal threshold value forimages with a known amount of noise. However, in most cases, thesetheories assume input image noise being white (noise power spectraldistribution is flat over frequencies and has no frequency dependence).This assumption does not apply for noise in images that flow in aprocessing pipeline of real cameras (FIG. 1).

As an alternative way to estimate image noise, a fast noise propagationmethod is known and used to predict noise amount in an arbitrary node inan image signal processing pipeline. However, this method does notaccount for frequency dependence of noise, and is able to havesubstantial error in noise amount prediction. If higher predictionaccuracy is needed, image simulation with a statistically sufficientnumber of pixels is performed. Then, the noise amount at the node ofinterest can be known by measuring the resultant image. However, this istoo computationally burdensome and is not realistic to be made real-timeand/or on-camera. No fast noise propagation method is available that cantake noise's frequency dependence in account.

As a result, there has not existed an image denoising system in whichthe system itself automatically and systematically determines theappropriate threshold settings for denoising. However, an improved imagedenoising system and method of implementing the image denoising systemis described herein.

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of an image denoising system 200. Theimage denoising system 200 is divided into two large blocks, a mainimage processing pipeline 210 including a Noise Reduction (NR) block216, and an NR control unit 250 which includes an image sensor noisemodel and noise propagation components.

Within the main image processing pipeline 210, an imager 212 acquires animage from the camera input such as by a user taking a picture. Imagingcomponents 214 that perform image processing such as gain, matrix andfilters which vary shooting conditions are coupled to the imager 212.The NR block 216 is coupled to the imaging components 214. The NR block216 splits the image with noise data bands, uses thresholds to filterout the noise in each band and then reconstructs the image without thenoise or at least with reduced noise. A post-processing component 218processes the image after it is reconstructed, and ultimately, the finalimage is output. In some embodiments, some of the components above areimplemented in software using a processor, for example, the imagingcomponents 214, the NR block 216 and the post-processing component 218.In some embodiments the components are implemented in hardware.

Within the NR control unit 250, an imager noise model, extended Burns &Berns (BB)—based noise propagation, predicted bandwise noise matricesand threshold value conversion are implemented. Extended BB is referredto in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/731,261, entitledMETHOD OF AND APPARATUS FOR ANALYZING NOISE IN A SIGNAL PROCESSINGSYSTEM, incorporated herein by reference. Preferably, the NR controlunit 250 is implemented on an embedded processor. The NR control unit250 ultimately determines the thresholds for the band-wise noise so thatthe band-split based NR block 216 is able to filter out the noiseappropriately.

FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart of the procedure for denoising using theimage denoising system. In the step 300, camera parameters are acquired.This step is in order to have necessary information to calculate noiseamount at a node of denoising. In real cameras, in a consumer-leveldigital camcorder or digital camera, for example, some image processparameters are adaptively updated depending on shooting conditions.These parameters are, for example, amplifier gain which changesdepending on scene luminance, auto-white balancing gains which changedepending on chromaticity of illumination, edge enhancement gain whichis able to be reduced under a dark and noisy environment and colorcorrection matrices parameters which is able to change to maintain colorconstancy over various illuminations. The changes in these parametersare able to significantly affect noise characteristics at the node ofdenoising. These parameters are preferably all taken into account. Theseparameters are usually available at the on-camera microprocessor and areable to be used when the image denoising system is implemented on acamera. Or, these parameters are able to also be made available viaheader information in recorded images and are able to be used when theimage denoising system is implemented as a part of image renderingsoftware that runs on personal computers.

In the step 302, input noise matrices are computed. In this step, theimage pipeline input noise (image sensor output noise) is specified. Tocalculate the noise, a noise model (equation (1) and constants a, b andc) and value x in equation (1) are needed.

As explained earlier, constants a, b and c are able to be specifiedeither by measurement or by theoretical derivation. The value x is ableto be in any unit, such as electron count, voltage or digital code valuewhile constants a, b and c should change accordingly. Some of, or all ofthese constants are a function of programmable amplifier gain. The valueof x in digital code value is able to be readily known by monitoringpixel values that flow in the image pipeline; but in thisimplementation, an alternative way is taken, which is to have a set ofrepresentative values and to store the values as a signal-to-noisemapping data. First, the value x (each component in a vector, (r, g, b)for instance, in case of a primary-color camera system) in arbitraryunits is calculated by integrating the element-wise product of camera,illumination and representative color patch spectral sensitivity,emission and reflectance distribution, respectively. Illuminationestimation is running in general consumer cameras, thus this estimatedillumination for computation is able to be used. For the representativecolor patch set, a Macbeth ColorChecker is often used. Next, from anauto-exposure algorithm, that is also running on-camera, informationrelated to absolute luminance of incident light (e.g. absolute number ofphotoelectrons) at the image sensor is able to be known, and the value xis known in a specified unit. The input noise matrix:

$\begin{matrix}{\sum\limits_{input}{= \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_{r} & 0 & 0 \\0 & \sigma_{g} & 0 \\0 & 0 & \sigma_{b}\end{bmatrix}}} & (2)\end{matrix}$where diagonal elements are computed by equation (1). At the input, itis able to be assumed off-diagonal elements of the noise matrix are zerobecause inter-pixel noise correlation is able to be considerednegligibly small in most image sensors.

In the step 304, band-wise noise is propagated. The noise propagationmethod disclosed in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/731,261,entitled METHOD OF AND APPARATUS FOR ANALYZING NOISE IN A SIGNALPROCESSING SYSTEM, incorporated herein by reference, is able to takeinto account important signal operations, linear, nonlinear and spatialtransformations, that are often used in a camera signal processingpipeline and is able to precisely predict noise that propagates alongthe pipeline. The equation (2) is band-split into N bands. As a result,the equation (2) becomes a band-wise expression of a noise matrix, whosesize is 3N×3N. Then, by applying a calculation explained in U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 11/731,261, entitled METHOD OF AND APPARATUS FORANALYZING NOISE IN A SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEM, band-wise noise matricesare possible at an arbitrary signal processing node (YCbCr for example),where the denoising algorithm is applied. Noise propagation is repeatedfor the number of patches. In the Macbeth ColorChecker's case, forexample, it is 24. Thus, there are 24 band-wise noise matrices, where Nis the number of bands. At the same time, to be used in the next step,signal propagation is also performed, and a set of 24×3 signal values isstored.

In the step 306, a three dimensional signal-to-noise Look-Up Table (LUT)is generated. The three dimensional LUT is formed in order to correlatesignal value and noise value. Any known method for generating arectangular raster set from randomly scattered representative points isable to be used.

In the step 308, pixel-by-pixel noise amount prediction occurs.Preferably, this step occurs in real-time. Pixel value (YCbCr, forexample) is input to the LUT, and the input pixel value is converted toa predicted noise amount. The LUT maps signal value to band-wise noisematrices. Band-wise noise matrices are interpolated or extrapolated,according to the input signal value. To avoid unnecessary fluctuation ofthe noise amount prediction, low-pass filters may be applied to the LUTinput signal.

In the step 310, pixel-by-pixel threshold control occurs. Since thenoise amount of the input pixel is accurately predicted, the denoisingprocess is able to have appropriate threshold value control. Forexample, the predicted noise amount is multiplied by a factor of three,then used as the threshold value.

From the steps 300 through 306, the computation does not have to bereal-time (in other words, pixel-rate calculation rate is notnecessary). The LUT has to be updated only when a shooting condition(e.g. scene luminance, illumination and so on) changes. The computationamount for generating the LUT is reasonably small, thus it is possibleto implement the algorithm in an embedded microprocessor in a digitalcamcorder or a camera, where shooting condition parameters are readilyavailable.

The more an image is processed from an image sensor output toward thefinal camera output, the more complicated the noise characteristicsbecome. To accurately predict noise amount in an image pipeline, thenoise's signal level dependence, frequency dependence and inter-channelcorrelation have to be considered. No fast noise propagation techniquehas been available that is able to consider the above mentioned threenoise factors at the same time. The combination of the three dimensionalLUT concept and the propagation technique are able to accurately predictnoise with reasonable computational resources. When this noisepropagation method is applied to an imaging system with denoising, thedenoising parameters are able to be appropriately set by referring topredicted noise values at the node of denoising. It enables thedenoising algorithm to perform significantly better and leads toimproved picture quality of digital imaging devices.

FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart of the procedure for denoising using theimage denoising system including additional steps. In the step 400, rawimage data is input such as by being acquired by a camera when a usertakes a picture. The box 430 contains standard camera image pipelineprocesses such as gain 432, white balance 434, color matrix 436, gamma438, and noise reduction 440. In parallel, camera parameters areacquired in the step 402, where an auto exposure algorithm runs and inthe step 404, where a white balancing algorithm runs. Within the whitebalancing algorithm is an illumination estimation algorithm and a whitebalance gain setup. From the auto exposure algorithm, noise modelconstants are computed in the step 406. After the white balancingalgorithm, illumination spectra, sensor spectra and Macbeth spectra goon to computing image values for a Macbeth Checker in the step 408. Thenoise model constants and image values from the steps 406 and 408respectively are used to compute noise matrices for the Macbeth Checkerin the step 410. In the step 412, the noise matrices are split intobands as described previously. Color matrix values and a gammacorrection table are used in conjunction with the band-split noisematrices to perform band-wise noise propagation in the step 414. Thecolor matrix values and the gamma correction table is also used with theimage values for the Macbeth Checker for signal propagation in the step416. Using the band-wise noise propagation and the signal propagation, agrid-raster 3D (signal-to-noise) LUT is generated, in the step 418.Using the signal-to-noise 3D LUT, table lookup occurs in the step 420,interpolation/extrapolation occurs in the step 422 and the data isconverted into thresholds in the step 424; all three steps occur inreal-time. Then using the thresholds, the noise is reduced within theimage pipeline in the step 440. Ultimately, an image with reduced noiseis output in the step 442.

To utilize the image denoising method and system, a user takes a picturewith a digital camera or a movie with a digital camcorder. Once theimage or video data is acquired, the data is processed byhardware/software components which perform standard imaging processingin addition to the denoising process described herein. The denoisingprocess includes splitting the data including noise into bands,filtering each band whereby a threshold is used for each band and thenreconstructing the data with minimized noise. After the noise isminimized or eliminated, post-processing occurs as well to produce aclear, denoised image or video.

In operation, an imaging device such as a camera or camcorder implementsthe required hardware and/or software for band-wise denoising. Theimaging device that is properly configured automatically handles thesplitting of the noise into bands, predicting and propagating the noiseand ultimately minimizing or removing the noise. The result is a muchless noisy image or video.

In an embodiment, an average image level is detected at a sensor foreach color channel in a set of color channels. The average noise levelis then estimated for each color channel. Noise is predicted at the nodewhere denoising will be performed. The threshold of the denoising methodis then able to be accurately controlled. In another embodiment, apeak-white image level is detected at the image sensor for each colorchannel in the set of color channels. Then, image levels for a set ofrepresentative colors are predicted. The noise level of each color patchand each color channel is computed. Noise at the node where denoisingwill be performed is then predicted. A 3-D look-up-table (LUT) isgenerated to correlate signal level to noise level. The thresholdsetting is then able to be adaptively controlled.

In an alternative embodiment, a pixel-by-pixel noise propagationpipeline is implemented, which works in parallel with the imagepipeline.

The present invention has been described in terms of specificembodiments incorporating details to facilitate the understanding ofprinciples of construction and operation of the invention. Suchreference herein to specific embodiments and details thereof is notintended to limit the scope of the claims appended hereto. It will bereadily apparent to one skilled in the art that other variousmodifications may be made in the embodiment chosen for illustrationwithout departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as definedby the claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of denoising an image programmed in amemory of a device comprising: a. acquiring an image wherein the imagecontains noise; b. splitting the noise into a plurality of sub-bands ofnoise; c. determining a threshold for each sub-band of noise wherein thethreshold is a multiple of a predicted noise amount, wherein thepredicted noise amount is determined based on a computation comprising aconversion of a pixel value using a lookup table and interpolation; andd. filtering out the noise below the threshold for each sub-band ofnoise.
 2. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising acquiringone or more camera parameters.
 3. The method as claimed in claim 2further comprising computing input noise matrices by incorporating theone or more camera parameters.
 4. The method as claimed in claim 3further comprising propagating band-wise noise from the noise matrices.5. The method as claimed in claim 4 further comprising generating asignal-to-noise look up table to correlate signal values and noisevalues.
 6. The method as claimed in claim 5 further comprisingpredicting a pixel-by-pixel noise amount using the signal-to-noise lookup table.
 7. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the threshold is apixel-by-pixel threshold.
 8. The method as claimed in claim 7 whereinthe noise is filtered out by the pixel-by-pixel threshold.
 9. The methodas claimed in claim 2 wherein the one or more camera parameters includeat least one of amplifier gain, auto-white balancing gains, edgeenhancement gain and color correction matrices parameters.
 10. Themethod as claimed in claim 2 wherein the one or more parameters areavailable at a processor when implemented on a camera.
 11. The method asclaimed in claim 2 wherein the one or more parameters are available viaheader information in an image when implemented with image renderingsoftware on a computing device.
 12. The method as claimed in claim 4wherein propagating band-wise noise further includes band-splitting theinput noise matrices into N sub-bands each.
 13. The method as claimed inclaim 1 wherein the steps a-c occur in real-time.
 14. The method asclaimed in claim 6 wherein predicting the pixel-by-pixel noise amountfurther includes: a. inputting a pixel value into the look up table; b.converting the input pixel value to the predicted noise amount; c.mapping signal value on an input signal to band-wise noise matricesusing the look up table; and d. interpolating and extrapolatingband-wise noise matrices according to the signal value.
 15. The methodas claimed in claim 5 further comprising updating the look up table whena shooting condition changes.
 16. A method of denoising an imageprogrammed in a memory of a device comprising: a. acquiring one or morecamera parameters; b. computing input noise matrices by incorporatingthe one or more camera parameters; c. propagating band-wise noise fromthe input noise matrices, wherein propagating the band-wise noise isrepeated for a number of patches in the image; d. generating asignal-to-noise look up table to correlate signal values and noisevalues, wherein the signal-to-noise look up table is only updated when ashooting condition changes; e. predicting a pixel-by-pixel noise amountusing the signal-to-noise look up table, wherein the predictedpixel-by-pixel noise amount is determined based on a computation; f.controlling a pixel-by-pixel threshold, wherein the pixel-by-pixelthreshold is a multiple of the pixel-by-pixel noise amount; and g.filtering out noise in the image using the pixel-by-pixel threshold. 17.The method as claimed in claim 16 wherein the one or more cameraparameters include at least one of amplifier gain, auto-white balancinggains, edge enhancement gain and color correction matrices parameters.18. The method as claimed in claim 16 wherein the one or more parametersare available at a processor when implemented on a camera.
 19. Themethod as claimed in claim 16 wherein the one or more parameters areavailable via header information in an image when implemented with imagerendering software on a computing device.
 20. The method as claimed inclaim 16 wherein propagating band-wise noise further includesband-splitting an input noise matrix into N sub-bands.
 21. The method asclaimed in claim 16 wherein the steps a-d occur in real-time.
 22. Themethod as claimed in claim 16 wherein predicting the pixel-by-pixelnoise amount further includes: a. inputting a pixel value into the lookup table; b. converting the input pixel value to a predicted noiseamount; c. mapping signal value on an input signal to band-wise noisematrices using the look up table; and d. interpolating and extrapolatingband-wise noise matrices according to the signal value.
 23. The methodas claimed in claim 16 further comprising updating the look up tablewhen a shooting condition changes.
 24. A system for denoising an imagecomprising: a. an image processing pipeline comprising a noise reductionblock coupled to the set of imaging components for reducing noise in theimage, wherein the noise reduction block splits the noise into sub-bandsand utilizes thresholds received from the noise reduction control unitto filter the noise; and b. a noise reduction control unit coupled tothe image processing pipeline, wherein the noise reduction control unitdetermines threshold values based on a multiple of a predicted noiseamount to reduce the noise, wherein the predicted noise amount isdetermined based on a computation comprising a conversion of a pixelvalue using a lookup table and interpolation.
 25. The system as claimedin claim 24 wherein the image processing pipeline further comprises: a.an imager for acquiring the image; b. a set of imaging componentscoupled to the imager for processing the image; and c. a set ofpost-processing components coupled to the noise reduction block forprocessing the image after noise reduction.
 26. The system as claimed inclaim 24 wherein the noise reduction control unit generates thethresholds based on the sub-bands.
 27. The system as claimed in claim 24wherein the noise reduction control unit is implemented on a processor.28. The system as claimed in claim 24 wherein the noise reductioncontrol unit implements an imager noise model, noise propagation andpredicted band-wise noise matrices to determine the threshold values.29. A system for denoising an image comprising: a. an image processingpipeline, wherein the image processing pipeline further comprises: i. animager for acquiring the image; ii. a set of imaging components coupledto the imager for processing the image; iii. a noise reduction blockcoupled to the set of imaging components for reducing the noise in theimage; and iv. a set of post-processing components coupled to the noisereduction block for processing the image after noise reduction; and b. aprocessor implementing a noise reduction control unit function coupledto the image processing pipeline, wherein the processor determinesthreshold values to reduce noise wherein the threshold values aremultiples of predicted noise amounts, wherein the noise reduction blocksplits the noise into sub-bands and utilizes thresholds received fromthe noise reduction control unit to filter the noise, wherein a threedimensional signal-to-noise lookup table is used to correlate signalvalue and noise value, wherein the predicted noise amounts aredetermined based on a computation comprising a conversion of a pixelvalue using the three dimensional signal-to-noise lookup table andinterpolation.
 30. The system as claimed in claim 29 wherein theprocessor generates thresholds based on the sub-bands.
 31. The system asclaimed in claim 29 wherein the processor implements an imager noisemodel, noise propagation and predicted band-wise noise matrices todetermine the threshold values.
 32. A method of denoising an imagecomprising: a. detecting an average image level at a sensor for eachcolor channel in a set of color channels; b. estimating an average noiselevel for each color channel in the set of color channels; c. predictingnoise at a node where denoising is performed; and d. controlling anadaptive threshold for denoising, wherein the threshold is a multiple ofa predicted noise amount, wherein the predicted noise amount isdetermined based on a computation comprising a conversion of a pixelvalue using a lookup table and interpolation.
 33. A method of denoisingan image comprising: a. detecting an average image level at an imagesensor for each color channel in a set of color channels; b. predictingimage levels for a set of representative colors; c. computing a noiselevel of each color patch and each color channel; d. predicting noise ata node where denoising is performed; e. generating a three dimensionallook up table to correlate signal level to noise level; and f.adaptively controlling a threshold setting for denoising, wherein thethreshold is a multiple of a predicted noise amount, wherein thepredicted noise amount is determined based on a computation comprising aconversion of a pixel value using a lookup table and interpolation.